First I will look at definitions of satire so I have a basis for my essay and understand the concept in its broadest definition. I looked at definitions from a number of dictionaries and have chosen to use The Oxford English dictionary and The Merriam-Webster Dictionary as authoritative sources for definitions.
The Merriam-Webster Dictionary defines satire as-
"a way of using humor to show that someone or something is foolish, weak, bad, etc. : humor that shows the weaknesses or bad qualities of a person, government, society, etc."
The Oxford English Dictionary defines satire as-
"A poem or (in later use) a novel, film, or other work of art which uses humour, irony, exaggeration, or ridicule to expose and criticize prevailing immorality or foolishness, esp. as a form of social or political commentary. Freq. with on, of, against."
Of the two the Oxford English dictionary definition is more detailed and gives more of a sense of the contexts in which the term is used. The definition mentions that satire is used to "expose and criticise", rather than just being a form of humour with no purpose other than entertainment. It goes on to mention that satire is a "form of social or political commentary" and by implication calls for reform and change.
I want to use this definition as a starting point and look into the impact satire has had in the past and whether it is still effective a weapon today. I will look at the ways in which satire has had to change to keep up with new technology and the way it engages with its audience.
No comments:
Post a Comment